
When two dogs become reactive together, the dog making the biggest physical response may not be the one starting the pattern. In Levi and Phoebe’s case, Cesar Millan identifies Phoebe’s alert behavior as the beginning of an interaction that draws Levi in. Helping the pair requires understanding that sequence and changing how their human leads them through it.
Their pet parent, Erin, is an active Saint Bernard rescue volunteer. Her own dogs’ behavior has kept them away from the group’s events, despite how important that work is to her. The lesson is about noticing the relationship among both dogs and the human, rather than treating a chaotic moment as two identical problems.
What to Notice Before the Pair Escalates
- Phoebe’s barking and lunging often begin the pattern before Levi joins in.
- Cesar observes the dogs separately and together to understand their different responses.
- A quiet dog can still be tense, so silence alone does not complete the assessment.
- Erin’s confidence and follow-through need practice beyond the first demonstration.
- Returning to a busy rescue event requires checking progress in that setting, not assuming it from success elsewhere.
Identify the Beginning of the Interaction
Levi had been comfortable in the household when Erin first brought him home. Phoebe joined later, and the family initially saw the dogs getting along. Over time, however, outings became difficult as both dogs reacted to other dogs.
Erin describes a repeated sequence. Phoebe, the smaller of the two, begins barking, jumping, and lunging. Levi then joins the reaction. Because of their size and strength, Erin struggles to hold both dogs once the situation has developed that far.
Cesar notices the same distinction during his assessment. He chooses to focus first on Phoebe because he sees her instigating the pattern. Levi’s response remains serious, but understanding where the interaction begins gives the work a clearer direction.
That is different from focusing only on whichever dog appears most difficult at the height of the reaction. In this case, Levi’s involvement cannot be understood fully without considering what Phoebe has already done. The pair is responding as a group, with different roles inside the same pattern.

Love and Rescue Experience Do Not Remove the Need for Guidance
Erin’s commitment to dogs is clear. She helps with transport, evaluations, and meetings with potential adopters. The rescue work gives her a sense of purpose, and being unable to bring her own dogs to events is painful for her.
The rescue organizer, Pam, is concerned about the danger the dogs pose at crowded gatherings. She has asked Erin not to bring them after a serious incident involving another dog. Pam values Erin’s contribution while also recognizing that the behavior needs to change.
Cesar does not treat Erin’s love for the dogs as the missing ingredient. He focuses on the guidance she provides when they become excited or protective. Erin herself acknowledges that she becomes nervous and expects something bad to happen.
The distinction keeps the lesson practical. Being devoted to rescue does not automatically make every interaction with one’s own dogs easy. Erin needs a way to apply calmer, clearer direction with this particular pair, including when she feels afraid of their next response.
Compare Behavior Across People and Situations
At the Dog Psychology Center, Cesar observes Phoebe away from Erin. He sees a calmer response when she is with his pack without her pet parent beside her. That comparison helps him understand how the relationship is contributing to the behavior he has been watching.
When Erin enters with Levi, Phoebe becomes closely attached to her again. Cesar describes her as feeling a need to protect Erin, and he notes that the behavior is no longer directed only toward dogs. He has also seen a reaction toward a person.
This makes the assessment more specific than describing Phoebe as generally difficult. Her behavior changes with the context. Cesar pays attention to her closeness to Erin, her uncertainty away from that role, and what happens when the family comes back together.
Levi also matters in this comparison. Cesar observes that he enters the group without the same difficulty Phoebe shows. That reinforces the need to understand each dog’s contribution rather than applying one broad description to both Saint Bernards.

Calm Is More Than the Absence of Barking
During the walking work, Cesar asks Erin to notice whether a dog has actually settled or has simply stopped making noise. He points out moments when alertness and tension remain even after the most obvious reaction has paused.
Erin practices under supervision, but her fear continues to affect the exercise. Cesar notices tension through the leash and reminds her to breathe. The work is not just about learning an action. It is also about how she delivers it and whether she follows through to a different response.
This is why the early demonstrations do not immediately settle the question of returning to rescue events. Pam can see that Erin is trying, while also seeing that the dogs are still reacting. Effort is meaningful, but the practical question is whether the behavior has changed enough for the setting they want to enter.
The source begins by cautioning viewers to consult a professional before attempting the techniques shown. That context is particularly relevant here because the dogs are large and have already been involved in a serious incident. Cesar’s assessment and supervised work should not be reduced to a simple instruction to walk two reactive dogs into a crowd.
Practice Gives the Human a Different Experience
Cesar organizes a pack walk at the ranch to help Erin experience her dogs in a different way. She had expected that allowing them freedom in that setting would lead to running away or conflict. Under his supervision, she instead sees them move with the group.
Erin describes the experience as a change in what she thought was possible. Cesar connects that with her habit of anticipating the worst. The walk gives her evidence of a different interaction, which becomes a starting point for her own practice.
Her homework does not require repeating the off-leash demonstration. Cesar explicitly says she can continue the walks with a leash while working toward the same calm frame of mind. He also asks her to pay attention to how she feels during the activity.
That detail keeps the lesson grounded. The purpose is not simply to remove equipment. It is to change the human’s participation and develop consistent guidance through an activity the family can continue practicing.

Readiness Needs Follow-Up in the Real Setting
After a month of practice, Erin returns with videos of her work. Cesar sees more follow-through during an excited moment and clearer direction at home. Phoebe also responds when Erin asks her to give space, which had been difficult during the earlier assessment.
Pam remains thoughtful about the next step. A rescue event includes many people, dogs, and children, so improvement at home does not answer every question about that environment. The conversation acknowledges those differences before the family returns.
At the later event, Cesar observes Erin moving with Levi and Phoebe. Pam sees the change she had hoped for and welcomes them back. The result shown follows weeks of practice and a return to the setting where the difficulty had affected Erin’s life.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Cesar work with Phoebe first?
He identified Phoebe as the dog whose alert behavior began the sequence. Erin described Phoebe barking and lunging before Levi joined in. Understanding that first response helped Cesar address the pair’s behavior more specifically.
Did stopping the barking mean the exercise was finished?
Not necessarily. Cesar asked Erin to distinguish a settled dog from one that had become quiet while remaining tense or alert. He wanted her to observe the state behind the visible behavior.
Did Erin’s homework require off-leash walks?
No. Cesar said she could continue walking with a leash. His emphasis was on maintaining the calmer frame of mind and noticing how her own feelings affected the interaction.
What showed that the practice was helping?
The follow-up videos showed stronger follow-through and clearer direction at home. Erin later returned to a rescue event with both dogs, where Pam and Cesar observed a different, more manageable interaction.
Understand the Pair as a Relationship
Levi and Phoebe’s case shows why the first signal deserves attention. Each dog contributes differently, and the human is part of the pattern they share. Erin’s progress comes through learning to recognize those differences and practicing the calm guidance her dogs need.